SkillAudit report — modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Scanned 2026-04-23 by SkillAudit v0.2 (static checks + LLM-assisted prompt-injection red-team).
Commit: 3d7b311 · Stars: 22747 · Days since last push: 0
LLM prompt-injection probe: skipped — set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to enable the LLM-assisted prompt-injection red-team
Overall grade: D (60/100)
| Axis | Score | Grade | |
|---|---|---|---|
| security | 60/100 | D | ❌ |
| permissions | 100/100 | A | ✅ |
| credentials | 90/100 | A | ✅ |
| maintenance | 90/100 | A | ✅ |
| compatibility | 100/100 | A | ✅ |
| docs | 100/100 | A | ✅ |
Security findings
Production sources:
- HIGH
src/mcp/cli/cli.py:48— subprocess with shell=True — arguments are parsed by /bin/sh
subprocess.run([cmd, "--version"], check=True, capture_output=True, shell=True)
Test-site findings (lower weight): 25 total in test/ paths — first 3 shown
- WARN
tests/shared/test_streamable_http.py:813— HTTP client call with user-controlled argument 'mcp_url' (validation markers present but not verified against this call-site)
response = requests.post(
- WARN
tests/shared/test_streamable_http.py:830— HTTP client call with user-controlled argument 'mcp_url' (validation markers present but not verified against this call-site)
tools_response = requests.post(
- WARN
tests/shared/test_streamable_http.py:848— HTTP client call with user-controlled argument 'mcp_url' (validation markers present but not verified against this call-site)
response = requests.post(
Permissions
_No findings on this axis._
Credentials
Production sources:
- WARN
examples/clients/simple-chatbot/mcp_simple_chatbot/.env.example— .env file present in repo tree — verify it's a template, not real secrets
examples/clients/simple-chatbot/mcp_simple_chatbot/.env.example
Maintenance
Production sources:
- WARN
(meta)— 442 open issues — triage backlog
442 open
Compatibility
_No findings on this axis._
Documentation
_No findings on this axis._
Methodology
SkillAudit v0.2 clones the repo at the provided ref (default: default branch, HEAD) into an ephemeral sandbox, runs six static checks over .js/.ts/.py sources, queries the GitHub API for maintenance signals, and runs an LLM-assisted prompt-injection red-team over the MCP tool surface. Each axis is scored against the rubric at
The prompt-injection axis extracts each server.tool(...) / @app.tool registration + the first ~60 lines of handler body, hands them to Claude Haiku 4.5 with a red-team system prompt, and asks for structured findings on untrusted-content flow into tool responses. One API call per scan, bounded at ~15K input tokens.
How to improve this grade
- Security — static: validate tool-input URLs against an allowlist before fetch/axios calls; use
execFilewith argv arrays instead ofexecwith template strings; never pass untrusted strings tosubprocesswithshell=True. - Security — prompt injection: never return fetched web-page / file / email content verbatim in a tool response. Wrap with a framing marker (e.g.,
<untrusted-content>...</untrusted-content>), summarize rather than inline, and never let untrusted content share a turn with credentials or other tool output. - Credentials findings: redact env-var reads before log lines and error messages; treat any string that ends up in a tool response as public.
- Maintenance: if the repo is inactive, document the maintenance model — "MCP tool, no breaking changes expected" is a legitimate signal.
- Docs: add a README install + usage section with a copy-pasteable command; add a SECURITY.md with a disclosure channel.
_Report generated by skillaudit.dev_
Want your repo audited?
First 100 audits go to waitlist signups in order. The engine runs against public GitHub URLs today.
Join the waitlist →