F

Public audit · 2026-04-24

zenml-io/mcp-zenml

Overall: F (10/100) · v0.2 scan · 6 axes · LLM prompt-injection probe

SkillAudit report — zenml-io/mcp-zenml

Scanned 2026-04-24 by SkillAudit v0.2 (static checks + LLM-assisted prompt-injection red-team).
Commit: 5771160 · Stars: 44 · Days since last push: 2
LLM prompt-injection probe: no-tool-surface

Overall grade: F (10/100)

AxisScoreGrade
security10/100F
permissions100/100A
credentials90/100A
maintenance100/100A
compatibility100/100A
docs90/100A

Security findings

Production sources:

response = requests.post(

response = requests.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=(3.05, 30))

r = requests.get(url, timeout=(1.0, 2.5))

Permissions

_No findings on this axis._

Credentials

Production sources:

.env.local.example

Maintenance

_No findings on this axis._

Compatibility

_No findings on this axis._

Documentation

Production sources:

missing


Methodology

SkillAudit v0.2 clones the repo at the provided ref (default: default branch, HEAD) into an ephemeral sandbox, runs six static checks over .js/.ts/.py sources, queries the GitHub API for maintenance signals, and runs an LLM-assisted prompt-injection red-team over the MCP tool surface. Each axis is scored against the rubric at .

The prompt-injection axis extracts each server.tool(...) / @app.tool registration + the first ~60 lines of handler body, hands them to Claude Haiku 4.5 with a red-team system prompt, and asks for structured findings on untrusted-content flow into tool responses. One API call per scan, bounded at ~15K input tokens.

How to improve this grade

_Report generated by skillaudit.dev_

Want your repo audited?

First 100 audits go to waitlist signups in order. The engine runs against public GitHub URLs today.

Join the waitlist →